Writes: Dusko JOVANOVIC, a representative in the Parliament of the Republic of Montenegro (Sunday, 13th June 1999. “DAN”)

As the NATO aggression on Yugoslavia has become more intensive, the incumbent Montenegrin government has become more nervous and restless. Obviously the happenings haven’t been favorable for them, and that has caused some steps.
The steps of the official Montenegro regarding the interior politics like the criticism of the regime in Belgrade, proclaiming it neutral, some Government members’ claims against the Yugoslav Army, foreign mentors, who have been the mirror of the aggressor countries haven’t been support enough.
For these reasons Milo Djukanovic begins his tour across the aggressors’ countries. He successively visited the aggressors’ centers: Paris, London, Bonn, and Brussels.
Kind conversations, honest encounters, compatibility of their attitudes are the characteristics of their meetings. Only the citizens of Montenegro and Serbia are in more difficult position; stronger attacks of the NATO aggressor succeed after each conversation.
During these visits “THE STATUTORY HALF OF YUGOSLAVIA” had to convince their partners that the five conditions which NATO had set to Belgrade in order to stop aggression were not enough; that there would not be peace, as long as Milosevic was the leader, together with the whole government garniture in Serbia.
It is necessary, he considers, to set the sixth condition and that is the removal of Milosevic. Of course he generously offered to substitute “wild democratic base” with “cultivated pro-European Montenegrin democracy”.
However that tour of “THE STATUTORY HALF OF YUGOSLAVIA” and “intersection” for the democracy in the NATO way was not enough to the mentors from the West.
He was ordered to put all that on paper, and to go to Bonn at the conference to ensure them all that what he was talking was not just a story.
Hastily, the government experts prepared the Propose of Montenegro for the supplement of the text: “Stability Pact for the South Eastern Europe”.
That propose considers the relationship between Montenegro and Serbia, giving tendentious, wrong, or it is better to say, false picture of their relationship.
Among the rest it is said:
“The elementary source of tensions and conflicts between Serbia and Montenegro and mutual mistrust is that Serbia, in fact, doesn’t respect Montenegrin state and Montenegrin nation. Instead of respecting the equality of Montenegro with Serbia while making decisions which are in the authority of the institution of the mutual state, Serbia has been trying to subordinate Montenegro and to shorten its idea of the statutory guaranteed sovereignty for a long time”.
First of all there are not tensions between Serbia and Montenegro, as the official Montenegro says. The statement, that Serbia does not respect Montenegrin state and Montenegrin nation, is a lie. Both these thesis of the Government of Montenegro are for the single exterior and interior use. What regards the second part of the text is all about the change of thesis. The official Montenegro is the one which has usurped all federal institutions like Custom and Payment Operations Institute by police and weapons. The police forces have been watching the mentioned institutions for a year. They are making obstacles to the federal state and not to Serbia to do the jobs which are in its authority.
In the Platform from Bonn it is claimed:
“Montenegro meets huge barriers for the shaping its economic system on the trade principles to be open towards neighbor and the world”.
Criminal, smuggling and grey economy are the only systems which work in Montenegro but not on open principles as they say but on closed cousin’s and godfather’s principles.
It is very well known by their mentors from the aggressors’ countries, but for their obedience and loyal politics they are forgiven.
At the end of the text it is said:
“Considering the produced level of mutual mistrust, we are in need for help and support of the international members”.
The gentlemen from the coalition “For a better life” are speaking of their mutual mistrust. To remind:
So called Montenegrin president who, for the aggressor’s public opinion is “THE STATUTORY HALF OF YUGOSLAVIA” said that his attitudes are compatible to the aggressor’s. That is the aggressor which capital cities he never leaves, which military escort and service of transport he uses, and when, between two bombings, he comes to Montenegro and expects and asks for “mutual trust”.
Does it have sense?
Consequently, the Platform from Bonn is just evidence more of the political support to the aggressor.

• < Prev
• Next >